Showing posts with label success. Show all posts
Showing posts with label success. Show all posts

Sunday, April 18, 2010

full circle

as wonderful as cs3216 is, i personally can't claim that it has had a revolutionary life-changing impact on me.  i can't claim any credit for this though.  great as prof ben is, so were my past teachers.  i have been blessed with great teachers in my primary school and secondary school (not JC) days.  moreover, i don't want to overemphasize the impact on cs3216 because i really don't think this should be the end or peak of my experiences in universities, seeing how i'm still in year 1.

that is not to say i've learnt nothing.  through the module, prof ben has encouraged many mindset changes, reinforced past lessons, and provided food for thought and call to actions for the future.  i find it hard to narrow down X things i've learn without repeating what has been said time and time again by prof ben, my classmates or my other blog posts, so i decided to share some key thoughts i had over the past sem.  its going to be a little messy.

if there was an award for least number of meetings during cs3216, it'll probably be me.  I had 2 meetings for Who is the Monkey? and Facebook Seminar each, and 3 meetings for Drag and Drop Search and Prince of Persia each.  since i don't have to stay behind after every lesson to be in a meeting, i've had plenty of time to be a kay-poh (busybody). thanks to my tolerant classmates, i've been allowed to shamelessly plant myself in their meetings.

being the guest members leaves me with no real stakehold on any issue.  it was then interesting to observe the tendencies that different people have on view points and arguments.  not that you can't do this during your own meetings, but believe me, its different when its not your project.  like the saying goes, 旁观者清.  i can almost definitively say that i've learnt just as much from being a kay-poh as from my own nightless hours.

so one of my first thoughts on working in a group is to say less, listen first, then think more.  of course, this is not a one size for all solution.  someone people think and listen too much, but don't say anything.  but generally, I think the above works for team leaders (who generally are more out-spoken and opiniated).  possibly.

i forgot where i heard/read this from - you have two ears, but only one mouth.  what you can say and what you can hear is inversely related.  the more you want to say, the more you'll not be able to get new insights.  not speaking is not enough, because you need to listen.  if you're too full of your own thoughts, even if you say nothing, you won't absorb anything from others.  and let's face it, nobody likes not being listened to. so it'll be nice to let your team mates know that you're listening.  incidentally, my brother just came back from his MAS scholarship interview, and was told that he should have thought more before speaking. so there.

when opportunities are offered to you, you jolly well grab it, cos its not gonna wait for you.  eldwin wrote kind words about me.  the truth is, i've seen too many opportunities fly past me through the years.  this lesson was taught to me quite a long time ago, just not followed for just as long a time.  in fact, i was almost about to do the same in this module, had it not been the timely encouragement/reminder of Reuben.  And it wasn't some long speech.  It was just a simple "Just go speak to him la. Go, now."  After that, the "grab opportunity" switch was kinda flipped.  So yup, I can't take credit for this really. Thanks, Reuben.  in general, university is a great time for such opportunities.  more so in cs3216, where effort has been made to bring these people to us.

Which brings me to my next point.  There's actually a lot you can learn from each other.  The class is not short of people who are talented in their own right.  Interacting with each other, you get to know each others experiences, successes, and even failures.  (Flame Shield Up) Its even easier to learn from others' mistakes than your own.  Why?  Because often, you tend to be slightly blind towards your own shortcomings.  When you look at others, you'll be slightly more open.  You'll keep in mind that you won't make that mistake.  Right?

Wrong. Interestingly, you may possibly go one full circle and then make the same mistake yourself.  So the real point here is that, you really can't be too stubborn towards yourself, and you have to be ready to fail quick and fail fast.  If anything, this is THE lesson I've learnt.  Its weird, because it goes against everything that we've learnt in school, academically at least.  the interesting thing about failing yourself is that you will have felt the pain for yourself. the pain could by you not listening, or simply because its something new that will be added unto your experience.  for the former no matter how many times people give you a certain advice, it may fall on deaf ears until you see it for yourself.  for the latter, in the world of evolving platforms, things are extremely dynamic, and you pretty much figure out what works and what doesnt along the way.

Before i start rambling, I'm going to end off after sharing a few additional random thoughts.

i've come a full circle from my first post, and i'll first like to use this picture again.

the more you know, the more you know you don't know.

having dabbled in education and coaching, when i actually look through the whole semester, you really can't help but notice the effort and careful thought put into designing the module such that it achieves it aims.  from requirements such as blogging, reports, pitching, to getting external speakers and even classmates to come to the module to help broaden the perspectives of the students.



i suddenly recalled what one of my teachers sent the class in an email.
life's full of adversities.  we keep thinking of when things will get better, but the fact is there is no better time to be happy than now, because life is a journey, not a destination.

i means its great that everyone is on a high now. but its really more important what happens after this module has ended.  my greatest wish for all my classmates (and myself) is that when NUS, life or work returns to the drone it was before CS3216, we remember that all CS3216 did was to show us what we were capable of if we put our mind, heart and soul into chasing our dreams.  the profs, classmates, and environment shouldn't matter.  i believe all my classmates are capable of this.  i hope to be able to do so too :)

and on that note, i'd like to thank prof ben for staying so late all the time, putting us in front of his own children and wife, our tutors who have been working so hard being the scenes to ensure everything has ran smoothly, my group mates who have endured my incapabilities, and my classmates who've put up with my flame wars :P

the end......or not ;)

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

and the nominees are...

most inspirational: tong yee from the thought collective


its extremely comforting to see that in this harsh world of start ups, there are still entreprenuers who stick hard and fast to their beliefs and visions, without comprimise, even in the face of a greater dollar.  other than hardwork, its nothing short of god's grace that they managed to do well even when turning down the obvious route to riches just to strongly (albeit a little naively) hold fast to doing the right thing.  how often do you hear a successful person who tells you "we don't do this (which isn't even something wrong) because we don't believe in it".  its like intentionally adding barriers to yourself.  as if the road of an entreprenuer isn't rough enough.


i must say i disagree with tong yee's point that sports do not teach skills that are transferable to the real world.  sure, there are no hard skills, but there are soft skills aplenty.  values such as tenacity, determination, discipline, teamwork are much better experienced in sports as opposed to the "nerdy" CCA.  on the other hand, i think shelfing books, setting up visualisers, sitting in an aircon room can't achieve these as well.


i also have another question/issue - isn't it a tad too dangerous for an organization to be built around one person?  i mean (god forbids) that person gets into an accident, then the company is going to disappear? shouldn't there always be transition of leadership, planning for worse case scenario? maybe not.


i'm a little acquainted with the whole NE framework and the problem with teachers, so I must say that its extremely gratifying to know that there are teachers who are out there willing to try to change the system.  it is worth noting that in a lot of the independent schools which control their hiring, there are many teachers who are equally inspirational and are interested in trying to shape mindsets.  even in the moe, there are good teachers who want to shape their kids beyond the textbook.  unfortunately, there are (possibly more) teachers who really don't give a crap.


on a slightly related note about mindsets,


Get fit, get a bonus
Some firms rewarding workers for keeping fit, recycling, charity work


i think this is ridiculous.  why do you need KPIs to make people care about their own health and the world around them :S is this asymptomatic of our education system? no KPI = don't do? its like compulsory CIP hours all over again :S

respect/adversity award: Chin Leng from SingaporeBrides.com


(i think) for many singaporeans, the story normally ends at the abyss.  being adverse to adversity and change is really not going to help our case.  can we really have a high adversity quotient in a country that has enjoyed many years great economic success with a government that has done a stellar job in deploying infrastructure?  how can we deal with upset, failure and rejection?


i'm quite a suck for "against all odds" stories.  Chin Leng may not be the coolest, most eloquent, smartest person around, but he's mighty resilient.  and that deserves respect (even Hoong An used him as inspiration).


persuasionFAIL award: Hoong An from HungryGoWhere


prof ben tried something similar for cs1101s.  he tried to tell us why we SHOULD not do it.  he got seniors to tell us why we should not do it as well. in the end, only 2 (i think) people got off the "speeding bullet train".  to any aspiring entreprenuer, i think instead of dissuading them, i'm pretty sure that he reinforced their beliefs.  well, most of the time, like Chin Leng said, the brashness of youth allows such advice to be turned into challenges, channeled into the desire to break the mould.


bottomline: i don't think negative persuasion works :P in fact, i think it beckons people to take up the challenge. especially in a class like 3216.


i like his pragmatic approach.  if (and a very big one at that) one day, i become an entreprenuer, i would choose his & leslie's route.  i think its important to stock up your resources before you embark on a journey.  yea, sure, you could bulldoze your way through, but you'll probably going to need a lot more intelligence & resilience.  pragmatism oozes from Hoong An actually, if you were like me and were kaypohing around after class, you would be able to see that from all the suggestions and advice he gave.


i-ran-out-of-awards: Ash from Interactive SG
unsurprisingly, Ash was flooded by the most people after the presentation. what impressed me immediately was how he offered everyone who brought an idea to him with a opportunity to go down to his office to pitch to him!  opportunities have to be taken when given.  in that LT last night, was opportunity to speak with 6 people prof ben considered successful.  i think more of us should cherish these opportunities.


one of the highlights of the night was when ash displayed the title of his slide right after prof ben said "there is no formula to success".  irony WIN.


other than that, a lot of what Ash said is rather consistent with what 3216 has been trying to tell us.  that's cos Ash works in the online space, where the rules of engagement are different.


my personal favorite: Leslie from Redsport


cos i like sports and its about sports. plus i've already talked about redsport the other time :P i'm pretty excited to see how redsport grows with our local sports scene which is progressing at (sadly) a glacial speed.


recurring themes from the night

1) success = pain
2) no passion = pain
3) no $ = pain

life is all about pain. beat pain to have a shot at beat life.


one of my favourite shows about pain - Rocky 4:


background, rocky faces of with a steriods-boosted russian who killed his friend in the ring.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSzdlL6arH0 - Rocky talking to his son about going one more round in life (from 4:39 till 5.45)

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

ceteris paribus

Cēterīs paribus is a Latin phrase, literally translated as "with other things the same," or "all other things being equal or held constant." It is commonly rendered in English as "all other things being equal." A prediction, or a statement about causal or logical connections between two states of affairs, is qualified by ceteris paribus in order to acknowledge, and to rule out, the possibility of other factors that could override the relationship between the antecedent and the consequent ~ wikipedia
i disliked econs in JC because of the whole study of ceteris paribus.  sure, its required for us to understand basic concept, and isolate individual relationships, but thats really not what happens in real life.  don't get me wrong though, i like econs, just not the way it was taught.  its good to keep ceteris paribus away when testing web apps.  you can't keep everything else constant.  the same message was repeated again and again, its not enough for an app to work on one station where all variables are controlled.

i LOVE the hotel buffet example.  its pretty fantastic.  instead of focusing on just maximising individual performance, looking at improvement at a higher order would be probably more effective - that's what i gathered.

i like how this course tries to make us to think big, look at the big picture, get ready for scaling up.  in the post-lesson discussion, prof said that there's probably no way we cant compete with mit, harvard in terms of brilliant minds in research, but we probably have a shot getting a facebook.  so beyond programming, its really more about high level perspectives.  i don't think any other CS mod teaches this.

i enjoyed the presentation very much.  i'm sure many of the more technical people had their appetites satisfied.
it was pretty high level technical stuff, din really get much, but it put lots of interesting ideas in my heads - things to keep in mind as I continue with the other modules.
 
prof said that zit seng was a "better person to teach [this topic] then me".  he probably can deliver the same content, but what zit seng had was real life working experiences.  when you sit in such sessions, its quite easy to tell between someone who's simply just read about it, as opposed to someone who's actually done real stuff.  that's the whole idea of me wanting to come to 3216 into the first place - doing real stuff, hearing it from real people.

this optimization thing really is an art :)

my driving instructor once told me "i tell you your mistake how many times also no use, if you fail once, you'll remember the mistake."  thankfully, i failed only on the trial run in the circuit by another instructor.  i guess that's the strange thing about humans, some mistakes or lessons really just need to be hammered into you the hard way.  its like how little children will never touch anything hot again after scalding themselves.

sure, the post-lesson lesson was kinda interesting, but i didn't really find it a big deal.  maybe its really cos I have an elite uncaring face.  i mean if you spend all your time complaining, comparing, speculating (zit seng's example of the guy who gave ACTUAL HARD DATA to back up the SoC lag comes to mind) to do actual stuff, you'll be much better off. i mean, its not like i don't complain.... (i complain a lot in fact), but its important to remember that nothing is really gonna come out of it.

kudos to my wave team! 2 X Guru + 1 X Noob + 2 other awesome members = win!

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

the world aint all sunshine and rainbows....



Background: Rocky Balboa (Sylvester Stallone) is a retired boxer in Philadelphia.  He's going to take part in an exhibition fight current world champion after an ESPN program ran a simulation of then and now - declaring that Rocky would win.

opiniated individuals ... and dare you throw money into the sea?

This blog says that the problem is that many times people that do have strong opinions refrain from expressing them because they are afraid of what other people might think.

Clearly, Chewy does not belong to this category.  And he sure can back them up.  And even better, he's open to opposing opinions.  I think that's a really cool trait to have.  There are many things you can be impressed about with regards to Chewy, his confidence, his witty humour, his willingness to get his hands dirty, his humility.  Little surprise that he's pretty high-flying for 32 year old :)

A side-thought before I continue in topic: Yea, US may be pretty screwed up.  However, all things equal, you'll be hard-pressed not to find distinct differences when looking at how people educated there carry themselves compared to Singapore.  Sure, I may generalise and maybe I just haven't seen enough people yet, but based on my personal experience (2 US educateed God-sisters, 2 close pals in US), I have always been pro-US Education system (well, of course if you can afford it).  What do you think?

sgFail...or not?

I shamelessly quote from Reuben in our MSN convo "im qt surprised google makes 100mil in sg. 100mil is no joke at all, no matter what industry".  I mean sure, I've always kinda knew that search is a big thing.  in some ways, chewy really smashed away the myth that there's no market in singapore. its even more interesting that he feels that the consumer culture in singapore is screwed up.  personally, i'm more inclined towards his view points.  i think in sg, your power as a consumer is really bad.  like ryan said, the culture is one of the main reasons for this scenario.  then begs the question, is it REALLY possible for the scales to be tipped?  too often, we have tried brave souls try and fail.  what is the problem?

i think its a matter of our mentality towards failure vs comfort zone: generally sgeans are more comfortable to stay in a bao-jia situation.  if it aint broken, why fix it? why make your own life so hard?  and i blame the education system.  students flock to the ivle to post stuff.  they say the stupidest thing in classroms for participation. why? becos we're damn kiasu and kiasi.  this psyche can not be better illustrated then looking at your google reader/rss reader for the past 2 days, after sadistic prof welcomed us back to the real world.

and it really does works! i had this discussion last sem, and i really think the education system in sg really not helping this culture

that said, i realy can't (in the forseeable future) see consumers grabbing the power back in sg.

throwing ideas against the wall .... and money into the drain

branching off from the previous point, i believe this concept is totally unorthodox to most sgeans.  with no offence towards those who expressed doubts against the CPA, i often find sgeans (myself included) quick to find fault or failure.  but like the second segment of chewy's talk on our tinted glasses, we often think that we're able to see from other people's point of view, but more often than not, we're still fixated on our own viewpoints, which we developed based on our experience.  we're really not as smart and knowledgeable as we think we are... well, i don't at least.

which is not a bad thing.  but perhaps, its time to look at throwing money into the drain .... even though we might not own a palace in indonesia

here's to a wonderful 2 weeks of deadlines and tests ahead!

(ps does this make me a fan again? :) )

Monday, February 15, 2010

pigeon impossible




Check out Pigeon Impossible if you haven't already.  the video's great, but the interviews, blog posts and pod casts are all awesome stuff as well.  I first watched it embedded (on prof ben's facebook, heh), so I didn't check out the guy's website.



Success formula #1 
learning by doing + learning by failing + importance of basics

Success formula #2

9 hours X 5 days * 52 weeks * 5 years = 11700hrs
(assumes 5 day working week with 8-5 working hours, which is probably an underestimate)

Happy Chinese New Year all!